Yes, words are useless
Under the 1951 law, violations that "involved importation, acquisition, or possession of cigarettes, the wholesale value of which was $50 or more" were made felonies.[37] The new statute also gave the Department of Revenue the "authority to seize the cigarettes and vehicles and vending machines when there was reasonable cause to believe that these cigarettes were being imported, transported, or possessed in violation of the law."[38] After the change in the statute, optimism again prevailed

Whilst I appreciate that CRUK have to be very considerate in terms of any position they take, and to be cautious with any statements to that effect, I do think it would to the Public Health community at large a world of good if they were to stop focusing entirely on statistical and chemical measurements, and actually *speak* to users of these devices and see the massive difference they make to their quality of life, and factor that into their studies and positions and without wishing to get to morbid, Im sure that quality of life is something CRUK would be familiar with for many of those it works with/for, and is not something that youd discount lightly
It's definitely what's happening here," Burke said
24 when the Ohio Senate voted to override its governor's veto of this provision: "It is the intent of the general assembly to preempt political subdivisions from the regulation of tobacco products and alternative nicotine products." In other words, cities, counties and townships in Ohio cannot take it upon themselves to enact or enforce any tobacco-control laws